Tom Ryan / A5omic

Protocol Log / Week 10

Week 10: Two Months In — The Vascularity Read

Research Note collecting · low confidence

QuestionAfter roughly two months of unbroken adherence, is there any observation that has persisted long enough to be worth stating publicly?

Current ReadRoughly two months in with no missed supplement dose and no missed training day, the standing observation is increased vascularity and a leaner look at what feels like the same bodyweight and muscle composition. That is now a persistent impression rather than a one-off note, which upgrades it from noise to a hypothesis — but it remains self-observed, uncontrolled, and fully compatible with placebo.

2 benefit 0 negative 2 neutral 1 limit

Claim Ladder

  1. This does not measure body fat, testosterone, or any internal mechanism.
  2. A persistent months-long impression is stronger than a single-day note, but it is still one observer rating his own body while knowing what he is taking.
  3. Placebo, expectation, two more months of daily training, hydration, and lighting can each produce this exact impression.
  4. Same bodyweight is a scale reading; same muscle composition is a guess. Neither has been measured with anything better than a mirror and a scale.
  5. The claim on offer is only: the impression has persisted, so it is now worth measuring properly.
Intervention Continue KSM-66 ashwagandha 600 mg/day and Tongkat Ali 200 mg/day with food, plus the daily training regimen, and put the appearance signal on the record properly.

HypothesisIf the stack contributes anything visible over months rather than weeks, it should show up as a persistent impression rather than a day-to-day fluctuation — while remaining fully explainable by placebo, training accumulation, or slow body-composition drift.

Completion Criteria7 of 7 days with both supplements taken and training completed, plus an honest written statement of the standing appearance signal and its confounders.

Signal Board Benefits, negatives, and limits
benefit Adherence streak
~2 months unbroken

No missed supplement dose and no missed training day reported since the protocol started on 2026-05-03. Weeks 3 through 9 are retrospective; this week is logged live.

benefit Vascularity / leanness
persistent impression

Noticeably more visible vascularity and a leaner overall look at stable bodyweight, first noticed around the one-month mark and still present now. Persistent, but self-rated and unblinded.

neutral Bodyweight
stable

Scale weight reads the same as at the start, which is what makes the leaner impression interesting: if real, it points at recomposition rather than weight loss.

neutral Side effects
none standing

Nothing has accumulated over two months that registers as a side effect.

limitation Confounders
placebo + training accumulation

Two months of unbroken daily training is itself a complete explanation for looking leaner and more vascular. So is expectation. The stack does not get credit on this evidence.

Charts Daily signal view

Adherence

1 Sun
1 Mon
1 Tue
1 Wed
1 Thu
Fri
Sat
Measurement Plan Supplement / Compound

Primary Markers

  • Dose and timing: both supplements taken with food; note any missed dose.
  • Training: regimen completed daily.
  • Appearance: vascularity and leanness impression, stated with its confounders each time.

Secondary Markers

  • Bodyweight: scale reading as a stability check on the leanness impression.
  • Side effects: anything new after two months of exposure.

Controls

  • No new supplement, device, diet rule, or training protocol has been added since Week 1.
  • The observer is unblinded and invested; treat all appearance language as hypothesis, not result.
  • The only claim this entry makes is persistence of an impression, not causation.

Daily Observations

5/7 days recorded · 71% protocol-hit rate

71%
Sun hit

KSM-66 600 mg + Tongkat Ali 200 mg with food; train.

Dose, training, appearance impression. Continuation day; streak intact.
Mon hit

KSM-66 600 mg + Tongkat Ali 200 mg with food; train.

Dose, training, appearance impression. Continuation day; streak intact.
Tue hit

KSM-66 600 mg + Tongkat Ali 200 mg with food; train.

Dose, training, appearance impression. Continuation day; streak intact.
Wed hit

KSM-66 600 mg + Tongkat Ali 200 mg with food; train.

Dose, training, appearance impression. Continuation day; streak intact.
Thu hit

KSM-66 600 mg + Tongkat Ali 200 mg with food; train.

Dose, training, vascularity/leanness noted for the record. Logging resumed today; the standing vascularity and leanness impression was written down properly.
Fri pending

KSM-66 600 mg + Tongkat Ali 200 mg with food; train.

Dose, training, appearance impression. Awaiting same-day check-in.
Sat pending

KSM-66 600 mg + Tongkat Ali 200 mg with food; train.

Dose, training, appearance impression. Awaiting same-day check-in.

Study Snapshot

Weekly test
KSM-66 + Tongkat, month two Same stack since 2026-05-03, no new variable.
Streak
~68 days No missed dose, no missed training day reported.
Primary signal
Vascularity + leaner look Persistent at stable bodyweight; placebo not ruled out.
Current status
Collecting Friday and Saturday of this week remain open.

Protocol Changes

  • Publishing resumed after a seven-week logging gap; Weeks 3 through 9 were backfilled as retrospective continuation blocks.

Where Things Stand

The protocol never stopped; the publishing did. Since 2026-05-03 there has been no missed supplement dose and no missed training day — roughly two months of unbroken adherence, with Weeks 3 through 9 now backfilled as retrospective continuation blocks and this week logged live again.

The Signal Worth Writing Down

Somewhere around the one-month mark, an impression started that has not gone away: more visible vascularity, and an overall leaner look, at what reads as the same bodyweight and roughly the same muscle mass. If that impression is real, it points at slow recomposition rather than weight change.

The reason it earns a public entry now is persistence. A vascularity note appeared once in Week 1 and again in Week 2, and both times it was correctly filed as noise. An impression that survives two months is a different object: still not evidence of anything, but a legitimate hypothesis.

The Honest Competing Explanation

It could be placebo, and that is not a throwaway line. The observer is unblinded, invested, and has been looking for exactly this. Separately, two months of daily training with no missed sessions is — on its own, with no supplement involved — a complete explanation for looking leaner and more vascular. The stack gets no credit on this evidence.

What Would Make This Real

The mirror has done all it can. The next step, if this is worth chasing, is measurement: waist circumference and progress photos under fixed lighting as a floor, body-fat estimation if available, and ideally a stop/restart block to see whether the impression tracks the stack or the training. Until one of those exists, the standing claim stays exactly this size: the impression has persisted, and persistence is why it is now on the record.

Licensed CC-BY-4.0.